Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOE vs XLP: how they differ

VOE and XLP hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOE and XLP hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOE and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOEXLP
Target Corp1.03%3.87%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc0.73%2.90%
Sysco Corp0.69%2.60%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co0.64%2.40%
Kenvue Inc0.64%2.39%
Kimberly-Clark Corp0.63%2.37%
Kroger Co/The0.53%2.05%
Hershey Co/The0.45%1.69%
Dollar General Corp0.44%1.65%
Dollar Tree Inc0.38%1.43%
Constellation Brands Inc0.35%1.26%
Kraft Heinz Co/The0.34%1.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOEOnly in XLP
Cummins Inc 1.71%Walmart Inc 10.84%
Valero Energy Corp 1.34%Costco Wholesale Corp 9.06%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%Procter & Gamble Co/The 7.46%
CRH PLC 1.24%Coca-Cola Co/The 6.87%
United Rentals Inc 1.23%Philip Morris International Inc 6.16%
General Motors Co 1.21%Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71%
SLB Ltd 1.21%Altria Group Inc 4.55%
Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%Monster Beverage Corp 4.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VOE and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isMid-Cap ValueConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.7 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.6%100.0%
Holdings17034

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOE or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOE returned +20.2% and XLP returned +6.3%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOE or XLP?
VOE charges 0.05% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOE and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VOE and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOE against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOE against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOE-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources