Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOE vs XLI: how they differ

VOE and XLI hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOE and XLI hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOE and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOEXLI
Cummins Inc1.71%1.71%
United Rentals Inc1.23%1.23%
PACCAR Inc1.10%1.10%
Delta Air Lines Inc1.01%1.06%
Carrier Global Corp1.00%0.99%
L3Harris Technologies Inc0.94%0.94%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp0.79%0.80%
United Airlines Holdings Inc0.77%0.77%
Norfolk Southern Corp0.61%1.23%
FedEx Corp0.58%1.19%
Dover Corp0.52%0.52%
Rockwell Automation Inc0.48%0.96%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOEOnly in XLI
Valero Energy Corp 1.34%Caterpillar Inc 8.52%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%General Electric Co 6.77%
CRH PLC 1.24%GE Vernova Inc 5.48%
General Motors Co 1.21%RTX Corp 4.44%
SLB Ltd 1.21%Boeing Co/The 2.96%
Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
Phillips 66 1.18%Union Pacific Corp 2.81%
Warner Bros Discovery Inc 1.10%Deere & Co 2.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VOE and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isMid-Cap ValueIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.7 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.6%100.0%
Holdings17081

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOE or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOE returned +20.2% and XLI returned +14.3%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOE or XLI?
VOE charges 0.05% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOE and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VOE and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOE against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOE against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOE-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources