Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOE vs VONG: how they differ

VOE and VONG hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOE and VONG hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOE and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOEVONG
Aon PLC0.58%0.18%
Cencora Inc0.91%0.15%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.72%0.11%
Cardinal Health Inc0.96%0.07%
Darden Restaurants Inc0.41%0.07%
Cheniere Energy Inc0.87%0.07%
Sysco Corp0.69%0.06%
Tractor Supply Co0.07%0.05%
Simon Property Group Inc1.20%0.04%
NetApp Inc0.53%0.04%
Kimberly-Clark Corp0.63%0.04%
Fiserv Inc0.41%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOEOnly in VONG
Cummins Inc 1.71%NVIDIA Corp 13.09%
Valero Energy Corp 1.34%Apple Inc 11.97%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%Microsoft Corp 8.98%
CRH PLC 1.24%Broadcom Inc 5.78%
United Rentals Inc 1.23%Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
General Motors Co 1.21%Alphabet Inc 3.91%
Warner Bros Discovery Inc 1.10%Tesla Inc 3.48%
PACCAR Inc 1.10%Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VOE and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isMid-Cap ValueRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.7 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50096.6%95.6%
Holdings170387

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOE or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOE returned +20.2% and VONG returned +7.2%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOE or VONG?
VOE charges 0.05% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOE and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VOE and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOE against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOE against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOE-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources