Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VO vs XLU: how they differ

VO and XLU hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VO returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VO and XLU hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VO and XLU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOXLU
Constellation Energy Corp0.78%5.61%
Sempra0.59%4.28%
Dominion Energy Inc0.58%4.24%
Entergy Corp0.53%3.71%
Vistra Corp0.52%3.55%
Xcel Energy Inc0.49%3.54%
Exelon Corp0.46%3.37%
Consolidated Edison Inc0.40%2.88%
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc0.39%2.86%
WEC Energy Group Inc0.37%2.69%
American Electric Power Co Inc0.36%5.26%
PG&E Corp0.35%2.62%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOnly in XLU
Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%NextEra Energy Inc 12.93%
Western Digital Corp 1.07%Southern Co/The 7.62%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%Duke Energy Corp 6.97%
Quanta Services Inc 1.05%NRG Energy Inc 2.18%
Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%Atmos Energy Corp 2.03%
Cummins Inc 0.95%Evergy Inc 1.41%
Datadog Inc 0.84%Pinnacle West Capital Corp 0.92%
Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%AES Corp/The 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VO and XLU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
XLU
State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isMid-CapUtilities
Total return, 1 year+12.0%+2.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.5 pts−15.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.4%100.0%
Holdings28231

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLU in plain words

XLU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%. It sat 10.0% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VO or XLU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VO returned +12.0% and XLU returned +2.4%, so VO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VO or XLU?
VO charges 0.03% a year and XLU charges 0.08%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VO and XLU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of VO and 100% of XLU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VO against XLU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VO against XLU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VO-XLU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources