Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VO vs XLRE: how they differ

VO and XLRE hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VO returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VO and XLRE hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VO and XLRE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOXLRE
Simon Property Group Inc0.67%5.01%
Digital Realty Trust Inc0.61%4.55%
Realty Income Corp0.56%4.57%
Public Storage0.49%4.51%
Ventas Inc0.42%4.50%
CBRE Group Inc0.38%4.11%
Iron Mountain Inc0.35%3.91%
Crown Castle Inc0.32%3.44%
Extra Space Storage Inc0.30%3.20%
VICI Properties Inc0.26%3.02%
AvalonBay Communities Inc0.26%2.73%
Equity Residential0.25%2.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOnly in XLRE
Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%Welltower Inc 11.07%
Western Digital Corp 1.07%Prologis Inc 8.72%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%Equinix Inc 7.10%
Quanta Services Inc 1.05%American Tower Corp 5.26%
Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%Essex Property Trust Inc 1.95%
Cummins Inc 0.95%Weyerhaeuser Co 1.80%
Datadog Inc 0.84%Kimco Realty Corp 1.78%
Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%Invitation Homes Inc 1.72%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VO and XLRE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
XLRE
State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isMid-CapReal estate
Total return, 1 year+12.0%+5.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.5 pts−11.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.4%100.0%
Holdings28231

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLRE in plain words

XLRE is an index equity fund tracking the Real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VO or XLRE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VO returned +12.0% and XLRE returned +5.6%, so VO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VO or XLRE?
VO charges 0.03% a year and XLRE charges 0.08%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VO and XLRE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of VO and 100% of XLRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VO against XLRE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VO against XLRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VO-XLRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources