Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VO vs XLP: how they differ
VO and XLP hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VO returned more over the year.
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VO and XLP hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VO | XLP |
|---|---|---|
| Target Corp | 0.57% | 3.87% |
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc | 0.41% | 2.90% |
| Sysco Corp | 0.39% | 2.60% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Co | 0.36% | 2.40% |
| Kenvue Inc | 0.36% | 2.39% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp | 0.35% | 2.37% |
| Kroger Co/The | 0.30% | 2.05% |
| Hershey Co/The | 0.25% | 1.69% |
| Dollar General Corp | 0.25% | 1.65% |
| Church & Dwight Co Inc | 0.22% | 1.50% |
| Dollar Tree Inc | 0.21% | 1.43% |
| Constellation Brands Inc | 0.20% | 1.26% |
| Only in VO | Only in XLP |
|---|---|
| Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23% | Walmart Inc 10.84% |
| Western Digital Corp 1.07% | Costco Wholesale Corp 9.06% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 7.46% |
| Quanta Services Inc 1.05% | Coca-Cola Co/The 6.87% |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04% | Philip Morris International Inc 6.16% |
| Cummins Inc 0.95% | Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71% |
| Datadog Inc 0.84% | Altria Group Inc 4.55% |
| Bloom Energy Corp 0.79% | Monster Beverage Corp 4.47% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| VO Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund | XLP State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | State Street |
| What it is | Mid-Cap | Consumer staples |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.0% | +6.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −5.5 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.4% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 282 | 34 |
VO in plain words
VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLP in plain words
XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VO or XLP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VO returned +12.0% and XLP returned +6.3%, so VO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VO or XLP?
- VO charges 0.03% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VO and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of VO and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VO against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VO-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources