Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VNQ vs VT: how they differ

VNQ and VT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VNQ and VT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VNQ and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVNQVT
Welltower Inc7.86%0.13%
Prologis Inc7.02%0.12%
Equinix Inc5.66%0.10%
American Tower Corp4.55%0.08%
Digital Realty Trust Inc3.67%0.06%
Simon Property Group Inc3.54%0.06%
Realty Income Corp3.12%0.05%
Public Storage2.54%0.04%
CBRE Group Inc2.26%0.04%
Ventas Inc2.20%0.04%
Crown Castle Inc2.06%0.04%
Iron Mountain Inc1.98%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VNQOnly in VT
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund 14.67%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
Opendoor Technologies Inc 0.26%Apple Inc 3.53%
InvenTrust Properties Corp 0.13%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
Landbridge Co LLC 0.10%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
Smartstop Self Storage REIT Inc 0.09%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
NETSTREIT Corp 0.09%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
Sila Realty Trust Inc 0.09%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Diversified Healthcare Trust 0.07%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

VNQ and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isUS real estateTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+5.6%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−11.9 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.13%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50063.3%55.2%
Holdings14610042

VNQ in plain words

VNQ is an index equity fund tracking the US real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 54.9%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VNQ or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VNQ returned +5.6% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VNQ or VT?
VNQ charges 0.13% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VNQ and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 63% of VNQ and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VNQ against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VNQ against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VNQ-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources