Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VLUE vs XLK: how they differ
VLUE and XLK hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VLUE and XLK hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VLUE | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 11.63% | 5.42% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 9.29% | 3.68% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 3.67% | 3.20% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 4.97% | 2.59% |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION | 1.89% | 1.23% |
| QUALCOMM INCORPORATED | 1.80% | 1.09% |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 0.86% | 0.70% |
| HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY | 1.30% | 0.33% |
| JABIL INC. | 0.57% | 0.23% |
| ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION | 0.78% | 0.21% |
| ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 0.21% | 0.19% |
| TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED | 0.27% | 0.17% |
| Only in VLUE | Only in XLK |
|---|---|
| GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16% | NVIDIA Corp 14.66% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66% | Apple Inc 12.86% |
| AT&T INC. 2.53% | Microsoft Corp 8.38% |
| CITIGROUP INC. 1.94% | Broadcom Inc 5.41% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.28% |
| FEDEX CORPORATION 1.69% | Lam Research Corp 3.02% |
| MERCK & CO., INC. 1.57% | KLA Corp 2.20% |
| COMCAST CORPORATION 1.50% | Sandisk Corp 1.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI USA Value Factor | Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +69.4% | +39.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +51.9 pts | +21.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.9% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 148 | 74 |
VLUE in plain words
VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.
XLK in plain words
XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VLUE or XLK?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VLUE returned +69.4% and XLK returned +39.2%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VLUE or XLK?
- VLUE charges 0.15% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VLUE and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VLUE and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VLUE against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VLUE-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources