Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VLUE vs XLC: how they differ

VLUE and XLC hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VLUE and XLC hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VLUE and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVLUEXLC
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.2.66%4.15%
AT&T INC.2.53%4.10%
COMCAST CORPORATION1.50%4.71%
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY1.09%4.49%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.0.17%1.44%
FOX CORPORATION0.15%1.26%
OMNICOM GROUP INC.0.12%2.51%
FOX CORPORATION0.10%0.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VLUEOnly in XLC
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63%Meta Platforms Inc 19.93%
INTEL CORPORATION 9.29%Alphabet Inc 13.10%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 4.97%Alphabet Inc 10.44%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 3.67%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26%
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16%Netflix Inc 4.84%
CITIGROUP INC. 1.94%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 1.89%Electronic Arts Inc 4.64%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88%T-Mobile US Inc 4.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VLUE and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Value FactorCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+69.4%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+51.9 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.9%100.0%
Holdings14823

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VLUE or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VLUE returned +69.4% and XLC returned −2.0%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VLUE or XLC?
VLUE charges 0.15% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VLUE and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VLUE and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VLUE against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VLUE against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VLUE-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources