Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VLUE vs VO: how they differ
VLUE and VO hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VLUE and VO hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VLUE | VO |
|---|---|---|
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION | 1.89% | 1.07% |
| VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION | 0.70% | 0.75% |
| UNITED RENTALS, INC. | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY | 3.16% | 0.67% |
| SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. | 0.62% | 0.67% |
| PACCAR INC | 0.91% | 0.61% |
| HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY | 1.30% | 0.58% |
| TARGET CORPORATION | 0.61% | 0.57% |
| TE CONNECTIVITY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 0.93% | 0.57% |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY | 1.50% | 0.53% |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 0.59% | 0.53% |
| NEWMONT CORPORATION | 0.64% | 0.48% |
| Only in VLUE | Only in VO |
|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63% | Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 9.29% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 4.97% | Quanta Services Inc 1.05% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 3.67% | Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66% | Cummins Inc 0.95% |
| AT&T INC. 2.53% | Datadog Inc 0.84% |
| CITIGROUP INC. 1.94% | Bloom Energy Corp 0.79% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88% | Constellation Energy Corp 0.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | VO Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | MSCI USA Value Factor | Mid-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +69.4% | +12.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +51.9 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.9% | 91.4% |
| Holdings | 148 | 282 |
VLUE in plain words
VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.
VO in plain words
VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VLUE or VO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VLUE returned +69.4% and VO returned +12.0%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VLUE or VO?
- VLUE charges 0.15% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VLUE and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of VLUE and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VLUE against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VLUE-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources