Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VGT vs VT: how they differ

VGT and VT hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VGT and VT hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VGT and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVGTVT
NVIDIA Corp16.85%4.22%
Apple Inc14.59%3.53%
Microsoft Corp9.47%2.73%
Broadcom Inc4.21%1.74%
Micron Technology Inc4.21%0.52%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.21%0.52%
Intel Corp2.03%0.38%
Cisco Systems Inc1.85%0.33%
Lam Research Corp1.56%0.29%
Applied Materials Inc1.40%0.28%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.35%0.27%
Oracle Corp1.46%0.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VGTOnly in VT
Applied Optoelectronics Inc 0.09%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
ACM Research Inc 0.07%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
SolarEdge Technologies Inc 0.07%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Ultra Clean Holdings Inc 0.06%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%
Navitas Semiconductor Corp 0.06%Meta Platforms Inc 1.21%
Veeco Instruments Inc 0.05%Tesla Inc 0.97%
nLight Inc 0.05%JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.72%
Bel Fuse Inc 0.05%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VGT and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isInformation technologyTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+35.4%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.9 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50086.9%55.2%
Holdings31710042

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VGT or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGT returned +35.4% and VT returned +18.9%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VGT or VT?
VGT charges 0.09% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VGT and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VGT and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VGT against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VGT against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VGT-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources