Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VGT vs VO: how they differ

VGT and VO hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VGT and VO hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VGT and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVGTVO
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC0.81%1.05%
Western Digital Corp0.76%1.07%
Fortinet Inc0.42%0.46%
Ciena Corp0.37%0.67%
Datadog Inc0.36%0.84%
Snowflake Inc0.36%0.41%
Cloudflare Inc0.34%0.76%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.34%0.63%
Motorola Solutions Inc0.30%0.67%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co0.30%0.58%
Flex Ltd0.31%0.29%
TE Connectivity PLC0.28%0.57%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VGTOnly in VO
NVIDIA Corp 16.85%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
Apple Inc 14.59%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
Microsoft Corp 9.47%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
Broadcom Inc 4.21%Cummins Inc 0.95%
Micron Technology Inc 4.21%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21%Constellation Energy Corp 0.78%
Intel Corp 2.03%Robinhood Markets Inc 0.77%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.85%Valero Energy Corp 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VGT and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isInformation technologyMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+35.4%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.9 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50086.9%91.4%
Holdings317282

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VGT or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGT returned +35.4% and VO returned +12.0%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VGT or VO?
VGT charges 0.09% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VGT and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VGT and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VGT against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VGT against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VGT-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources