Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VGT vs VLUE: how they differ
VGT and VLUE hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VGT and VLUE hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VGT | VLUE |
|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc | 4.21% | 11.63% |
| Intel Corp | 2.03% | 9.29% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.85% | 4.97% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.40% | 3.67% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 1.09% | 1.80% |
| Western Digital Corp | 0.76% | 1.89% |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 0.61% | 0.86% |
| Accenture PLC | 0.47% | 0.65% |
| NXP Semiconductors NV | 0.38% | 1.00% |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.30% | 1.30% |
| TE Connectivity PLC | 0.28% | 0.93% |
| ON Semiconductor Corp | 0.26% | 0.78% |
| Only in VGT | Only in VLUE |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 16.85% | GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16% |
| Apple Inc 14.59% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66% |
| Microsoft Corp 9.47% | AT&T INC. 2.53% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.21% | CITIGROUP INC. 1.94% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21% | BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88% |
| Lam Research Corp 1.56% | FEDEX CORPORATION 1.69% |
| Oracle Corp 1.46% | MERCK & CO., INC. 1.57% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc 1.35% | COMCAST CORPORATION 1.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund | VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | iShares |
| What it is | Information technology | MSCI USA Value Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.4% | +69.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +17.9 pts | +51.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.9% | 96.9% |
| Holdings | 317 | 148 |
VGT in plain words
VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VLUE in plain words
VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VGT or VLUE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGT returned +35.4% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VGT or VLUE?
- VGT charges 0.09% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VGT and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VGT and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VGT against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VGT-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources