Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VGLT vs XLG: how they differ
VGLT is a bond index fund and XLG an equity index fund, and over the year XLG returned more, +12.2% against −5.4%.
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
| VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Invesco |
| What it is | Long-term Treasury | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | −5.4% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −22.9 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.20% |
| Holdings | not filed | 51 |
VGLT in plain words
VGLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −5.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 39.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VGLT or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGLT returned −5.4% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VGLT against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VGLT-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources