Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VGK vs VYMI: how they differ
VGK and VYMI hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and VYMI returned more over the year.
Vanguard European Stock Index Fund and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VGK and VYMI hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VGK | VYMI |
|---|---|---|
| HSBC Holdings PLC | 2.05% | 1.73% |
| Novartis AG | 1.84% | 1.56% |
| Nestle SA | 1.69% | 1.44% |
| Banco Santander SA | 1.16% | 0.98% |
| Allianz SE | 1.13% | 0.95% |
| TotalEnergies SE | 1.09% | 0.93% |
| Iberdrola SA | 1.00% | 0.84% |
| UBS Group AG | 0.90% | 0.77% |
| Novo Nordisk A/S | 0.88% | 0.75% |
| BP PLC | 0.80% | 0.69% |
| Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA | 0.81% | 0.69% |
| British American Tobacco PLC | 0.80% | 0.68% |
| Only in VGK | Only in VYMI |
|---|---|
| ASML Holding NV 3.63% | Royal Bank of Canada 1.38% |
| AstraZeneca PLC 1.84% | Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.15% |
| Siemens AG 1.41% | Toyota Motor Corp 1.12% |
| SAP SE 1.12% | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.08% |
| Schneider Electric SE 1.12% | BHP Group Ltd 1.06% |
| ABB Ltd 1.02% | Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 0.99% |
| Siemens Energy AG 1.02% | Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc 0.71% |
| Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC 0.88% | Enbridge Inc 0.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| VGK Vanguard European Stock Index Fund | VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| What it is | European Stock | International High Dividend Yield |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | +28.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.0 pts | +10.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Holdings | 1228 | 1582 |
VGK in plain words
VGK is an index equity fund tracking the European Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1228 positions, with the top ten at 18.1%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VYMI in plain words
VYMI is an index equity fund tracking the International High Dividend Yield. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1582 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VGK or VYMI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGK returned +16.5% and VYMI returned +28.2%, so VYMI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VGK or VYMI?
- VGK charges 0.06% a year and VYMI charges 0.07%, so VGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VGK and VYMI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VGK and 0% of VYMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VGK against VYMI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VGK-VYMI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources