Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VEA vs VYMI: how they differ

VEA and VYMI hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and VYMI returned more over the year.

Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VEA and VYMI hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VEA and VYMI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVEAVYMI
HSBC Holdings PLC1.01%1.73%
Novartis AG0.91%1.56%
Royal Bank of Canada0.90%1.38%
Nestle SA0.82%1.44%
Shell PLC0.68%1.43%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc0.67%1.08%
BHP Group Ltd0.66%1.06%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The0.63%0.99%
Banco Santander SA0.62%0.98%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia0.59%1.15%
Allianz SE0.56%0.95%
Toyota Motor Corp0.56%1.12%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VEAOnly in VYMI
ASML Holding NV 2.37%MediaTek Inc 0.66%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.56%Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd 0.46%
SK hynix Inc 1.40%Vale SA 0.32%
AstraZeneca PLC 0.87%Al Rajhi Bank 0.29%
Siemens AG 0.73%Anglogold Ashanti Plc 0.26%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 0.66%Saudi Arabian Oil Co 0.24%
Kioxia Holdings Corp 0.61%Infosys Ltd 0.24%
Schneider Electric SE 0.55%Petroleo Brasileiro SA 0.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VEA and VYMI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VEA
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isDeveloped markets ex USInternational High Dividend Yield
Total return, 1 year+24.5%+28.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.0 pts+10.7 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.1%
Holdings38701582

VEA in plain words

VEA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3870 positions, with the top ten at 13.2%.

VYMI in plain words

VYMI is an index equity fund tracking the International High Dividend Yield. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1582 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VEA or VYMI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VEA returned +24.5% and VYMI returned +28.2%, so VYMI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VEA or VYMI?
VEA charges 0.03% a year and VYMI charges 0.07%, so VEA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VEA and VYMI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VEA and 0% of VYMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VEA against VYMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VEA against VYMI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VEA-VYMI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources