Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VEA vs VGK: how they differ

VEA and VGK hold 47% of their weight in the same names, and VEA returned more over the year.

Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund and Vanguard European Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VEA and VGK hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VEA and VGK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVEAVGK
ASML Holding NV2.37%3.63%
HSBC Holdings PLC1.01%2.05%
Novartis AG0.91%1.84%
AstraZeneca PLC0.87%1.84%
Nestle SA0.82%1.69%
Siemens AG0.73%1.41%
Banco Santander SA0.62%1.16%
Allianz SE0.56%1.13%
Schneider Electric SE0.55%1.12%
ABB Ltd0.52%1.02%
Iberdrola SA0.52%1.00%
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC0.50%0.88%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VEAOnly in VGK
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.56%Ferrovial SE 0.21%
SK hynix Inc 1.40%Wise PLC 0.07%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.90%EDP Renovaveis SA 0.03%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 0.67%Carnival PLC 0.02%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 0.66%Billerud Aktiebolag 0.01%
BHP Group Ltd 0.66%Galapagos NV 0.01%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 0.63%Nyfosa AB 0.01%
Kioxia Holdings Corp 0.61%u-blox Holding AG 0.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VEA and VGK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VEA
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund
VGK
Vanguard European Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isDeveloped markets ex USEuropean Stock
Total return, 1 year+24.5%+16.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.0 pts−1.0 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings38701228

VEA in plain words

VEA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3870 positions, with the top ten at 13.2%.

VGK in plain words

VGK is an index equity fund tracking the European Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1228 positions, with the top ten at 18.1%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VEA or VGK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VEA returned +24.5% and VGK returned +16.5%, so VEA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VEA or VGK?
VEA charges 0.03% a year and VGK charges 0.06%, so VEA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VEA and VGK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VEA and 0% of VGK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 47% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VEA against VGK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VEA against VGK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VEA-VGK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources