Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VDE vs VTWO: how they differ

VDE and VTWO hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VDE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Energy Index Fund and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VDE and VTWO hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VDE and VTWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVDEVTWO
SM Energy Co0.33%0.23%
Uranium Energy Corp0.31%0.19%
Kodiak Gas Services Inc0.32%0.18%
Noble Corp PLC0.21%0.17%
Archrock Inc0.27%0.17%
Valaris Ltd0.28%0.17%
Transocean Ltd0.29%0.17%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp0.24%0.15%
Murphy Oil Corp0.24%0.14%
CNX Resources Corp0.23%0.14%
Liberty Energy Inc0.23%0.14%
CONSOL Energy Inc0.22%0.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VDEOnly in VTWO
Exxon Mobil Corp 21.37%Bloom Energy Corp 1.83%
Chevron Corp 14.53%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.12%
ConocoPhillips 5.79%Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.76%
Williams Cos Inc/The 3.65%Fabrinet 0.69%
SLB Ltd 3.49%Nextpower Inc 0.67%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 3.29%IonQ Inc 0.63%
Valero Energy Corp 3.19%Coeur Mining Inc 0.58%
EOG Resources Inc 3.06%TTM Technologies Inc 0.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

VDE and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VDE
Vanguard Energy Index Fund
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isEnergyRussell 2000
Total return, 1 year+50.6%+21.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+33.1 pts+3.9 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50081.6%0.5%
Holdings1051951

VDE in plain words

VDE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 82% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 64.0%.

VTWO in plain words

VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VDE or VTWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VDE returned +50.6% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so VDE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VDE or VTWO?
VDE charges 0.09% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VDE and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 82% of VDE and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VDE against VTWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VDE against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VDE-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources