Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VDC vs XLP: how they differ

VDC and XLP hold 75% of their weight in the same names, and XLP returned more over the year.

Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VDC and XLP hold 75% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VDC and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVDCXLP
Walmart Inc14.76%10.84%
Costco Wholesale Corp12.04%9.06%
Procter & Gamble Co/The9.27%7.46%
Coca-Cola Co/The8.72%6.87%
Philip Morris International Inc4.66%6.16%
PepsiCo Inc4.30%4.34%
Altria Group Inc3.91%4.55%
Mondelez International Inc2.69%4.17%
Colgate-Palmolive Co2.37%4.71%
Monster Beverage Corp2.24%4.47%
Target Corp2.03%3.87%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co1.41%2.40%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VDCOnly in XLP
US Foods Holding Corp 0.74%Bunge Global SA 0.94%
Bunge Global SA 0.73%
Performance Food Group Co 0.66%
Darling Ingredients Inc 0.52%
BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc 0.50%
Sprouts Farmers Market Inc 0.46%
Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc 0.45%
Primo Brands Corp 0.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VDC and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isConsumer StaplesConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+4.6%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.9 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50086.6%100.0%
Holdings10334

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VDC or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VDC returned +4.6% and XLP returned +6.3%, so XLP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VDC or XLP?
VDC charges 0.09% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VDC and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VDC and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 75% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VDC against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VDC against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VDC-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources