Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VDC vs VTV: how they differ

VDC and VTV hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VDC and VTV hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VDC and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVDCVTV
Walmart Inc14.76%1.87%
Procter & Gamble Co/The9.27%1.28%
Philip Morris International Inc4.66%1.06%
Coca-Cola Co/The8.72%1.05%
PepsiCo Inc4.30%0.70%
Altria Group Inc3.91%0.45%
Mondelez International Inc2.69%0.28%
Colgate-Palmolive Co2.37%0.28%
Target Corp2.03%0.22%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc1.41%0.16%
Sysco Corp1.30%0.15%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co1.41%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VDCOnly in VTV
Costco Wholesale Corp 12.04%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
Monster Beverage Corp 2.24%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
Casey's General Stores Inc 1.11%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
US Foods Holding Corp 0.74%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
Bunge Global SA 0.73%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
Performance Food Group Co 0.66%Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
Darling Ingredients Inc 0.52%AbbVie Inc 1.67%
J M Smucker Co/The 0.51%Cisco Systems Inc 1.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VDC and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isConsumer StaplesUS value
Total return, 1 year+4.6%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.9 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50086.6%98.6%
Holdings103308

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VDC or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VDC returned +4.6% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VDC or VTV?
VDC charges 0.09% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VDC and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VDC and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VDC against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VDC against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VDC-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources