Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VDC vs VT: how they differ

VDC and VT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VDC and VT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VDC and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVDCVT
Walmart Inc14.76%0.52%
Costco Wholesale Corp12.04%0.41%
Procter & Gamble Co/The9.27%0.31%
Coca-Cola Co/The8.72%0.28%
Philip Morris International Inc4.66%0.23%
PepsiCo Inc4.30%0.20%
Altria Group Inc3.91%0.11%
Mondelez International Inc2.69%0.07%
Colgate-Palmolive Co2.37%0.06%
Target Corp2.03%0.05%
Monster Beverage Corp2.24%0.05%
Kroger Co/The1.39%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VDCOnly in VT
Vita Coco Co Inc/The 0.34%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
United Natural Foods Inc 0.32%Apple Inc 3.53%
Andersons Inc/The 0.29%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
Chefs' Warehouse Inc/The 0.27%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
Seaboard Corp 0.19%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
Ingles Markets Inc 0.16%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
Turning Point Brands Inc 0.16%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Herbalife Ltd 0.16%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VDC and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isConsumer StaplesTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+4.6%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.9 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50086.6%55.2%
Holdings10310042

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VDC or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VDC returned +4.6% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VDC or VT?
VDC charges 0.09% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VDC and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VDC and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VDC against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VDC against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VDC-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources