Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VDC vs VONG: how they differ
VDC and VONG hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VONG returned more over the year.
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VDC and VONG hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VDC | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| Costco Wholesale Corp | 12.04% | 1.28% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 8.72% | 0.45% |
| Monster Beverage Corp | 2.24% | 0.18% |
| Walmart Inc | 14.76% | 0.15% |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co | 2.37% | 0.10% |
| PepsiCo Inc | 4.30% | 0.08% |
| Sysco Corp | 1.30% | 0.06% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp | 1.01% | 0.04% |
| Sprouts Farmers Market Inc | 0.46% | 0.02% |
| Celsius Holdings Inc | 0.29% | 0.02% |
| Casey's General Stores Inc | 1.11% | 0.01% |
| Hershey Co/The | 1.06% | 0.01% |
| Only in VDC | Only in VONG |
|---|---|
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 9.27% | NVIDIA Corp 13.09% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 4.66% | Apple Inc 11.97% |
| Altria Group Inc 3.91% | Microsoft Corp 8.98% |
| Mondelez International Inc 2.69% | Broadcom Inc 5.78% |
| Target Corp 2.03% | Amazon.com Inc 5.07% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 1.41% | Alphabet Inc 3.91% |
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 1.41% | Tesla Inc 3.48% |
| Kroger Co/The 1.39% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.20% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| What it is | Consumer Staples | Russell 1000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.6% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −12.9 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.6% | 95.6% |
| Holdings | 103 | 387 |
VDC in plain words
VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VDC or VONG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VDC returned +4.6% and VONG returned +7.2%, so VONG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VDC or VONG?
- VDC charges 0.09% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VDC and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VDC and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VDC against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VDC-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources