Which returned more over the last year, VCLT or XLK?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VCLT returned −4.8% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, VCLT or XLK?

VCLT charges 0.03% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VCLT vs XLK: how they differ

VCLT and XLK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VCLT and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VCLT	Only in XLK
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%	NVIDIA Corp 14.66%
CVS Health Corp 0.34%	Apple Inc 12.86%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%	Microsoft Corp 8.38%
Boeing Co/The 0.27%	Micron Technology Inc 5.42%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%	Broadcom Inc 5.41%
Amazon.com Inc 0.26%	Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.28%
Oracle Corp 0.24%	Intel Corp 3.68%
AT&T Inc 0.24%	Applied Materials Inc 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VCLT and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund	XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	State Street
What it is	Long-Term Corporate Bond	Technology
Total return, 1 year	−4.8%	+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−22.3 pts	+21.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.08%
Holdings	2775	74

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VCLT or XLK?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VCLT returned −4.8% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VCLT or XLK?: VCLT charges 0.03% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VCLT against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VCLT against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VCLT-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources