Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VBR vs XLRE: how they differ
VBR and XLRE hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VBR returned more over the year.
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund and State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VBR and XLRE hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VBR | XLRE |
|---|---|---|
| Essex Property Trust Inc | 0.40% | 1.95% |
| Invitation Homes Inc | 0.39% | 1.72% |
| Kimco Realty Corp | 0.37% | 1.78% |
| Host Hotels & Resorts Inc | 0.35% | 1.57% |
| Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc | 0.35% | 1.68% |
| Healthpeak Properties Inc | 0.32% | 1.54% |
| Regency Centers Corp | 0.31% | 1.37% |
| Camden Property Trust | 0.25% | 1.20% |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | 0.23% | 1.01% |
| BXP Inc | 0.23% | 1.02% |
| Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc | 0.20% | 0.86% |
| Weyerhaeuser Co | 0.18% | 1.80% |
| Only in VBR | Only in XLRE |
|---|---|
| Jabil Inc 0.87% | Welltower Inc 11.07% |
| NRG Energy Inc 0.66% | Prologis Inc 8.72% |
| Tapestry Inc 0.64% | Equinix Inc 7.10% |
| Atmos Energy Corp 0.62% | American Tower Corp 5.26% |
| Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59% | Simon Property Group Inc 5.01% |
| Moderna Inc 0.54% | Realty Income Corp 4.57% |
| Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.55% |
| F5 Inc 0.50% | Public Storage 4.51% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund | XLRE State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | State Street |
| What it is | Small-Cap Value | Real estate |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | +5.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.2 pts | −11.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 30.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 840 | 31 |
VBR in plain words
VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLRE in plain words
XLRE is an index equity fund tracking the Real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VBR or XLRE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBR returned +16.3% and XLRE returned +5.6%, so VBR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VBR or XLRE?
- VBR charges 0.05% a year and XLRE charges 0.08%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VBR and XLRE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 30% of VBR and 100% of XLRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBR against XLRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBR-XLRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources