Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VBR vs XLI: how they differ

VBR and XLI hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VBR returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VBR and XLI hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VBR and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBRXLI
EMCOR Group Inc0.40%0.64%
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc0.45%0.39%
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc0.47%0.38%
IDEX Corp0.36%0.29%
Masco Corp0.35%0.29%
Fedex Freight Holding Co Inc0.35%0.28%
Textron Inc0.34%0.28%
Jacobs Solutions Inc0.32%0.26%
Stanley Black & Decker Inc0.31%0.25%
Leidos Holdings Inc0.28%0.23%
Fortive Corp0.20%0.32%
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc0.24%0.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBROnly in XLI
Jabil Inc 0.87%Caterpillar Inc 8.52%
NRG Energy Inc 0.66%General Electric Co 6.77%
Tapestry Inc 0.64%GE Vernova Inc 5.48%
Atmos Energy Corp 0.62%RTX Corp 4.44%
Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%Boeing Co/The 2.96%
Moderna Inc 0.54%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%Union Pacific Corp 2.81%
F5 Inc 0.50%Deere & Co 2.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VBR and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isSmall-Cap ValueIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.2 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50030.5%100.0%
Holdings84081

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VBR or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBR returned +16.3% and XLI returned +14.3%, so VBR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VBR or XLI?
VBR charges 0.05% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VBR and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 30% of VBR and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VBR against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBR against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBR-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources