Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VBR vs VGT: how they differ

VBR and VGT hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VBR and VGT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VBR and VGT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBRVGT
Flex Ltd0.32%0.31%
Jabil Inc0.87%0.20%
Qnity Electronics Inc0.37%0.18%
Akamai Technologies Inc0.37%0.16%
F5 Inc0.50%0.15%
MKS Instruments Inc0.32%0.14%
TD SYNNEX Corp0.41%0.14%
Sanmina Corp0.14%0.13%
Enphase Energy Inc0.13%0.12%
Gen Digital Inc0.29%0.11%
CDW Corp/DE0.39%0.11%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.23%0.11%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBROnly in VGT
NRG Energy Inc 0.66%NVIDIA Corp 16.85%
Tapestry Inc 0.64%Apple Inc 14.59%
Atmos Energy Corp 0.62%Microsoft Corp 9.47%
Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%Broadcom Inc 4.21%
Moderna Inc 0.54%Micron Technology Inc 4.21%
Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21%
US Foods Holding Corp 0.48%Intel Corp 2.03%
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc 0.47%Cisco Systems Inc 1.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VBR and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-Cap ValueInformation technology
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.2 pts+17.9 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50030.5%86.9%
Holdings840317

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VBR or VGT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VBR returned +16.3% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VBR or VGT?
VBR charges 0.05% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VBR and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 30% of VBR and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VBR against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VBR against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VBR-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources