Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs XLV: how they differ

VB and XLV hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and XLV returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and XLV hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and XLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBXLV
Moderna Inc0.30%0.43%
Incyte Corp0.23%0.33%
Viatris Inc0.23%0.32%
Centene Corp0.19%0.53%
Cooper Cos Inc/The0.17%0.24%
Revvity Inc0.15%0.22%
Align Technology Inc0.14%0.20%
Solventum Corp0.14%0.20%
Bio-Techne Corp0.14%0.19%
Baxter International Inc0.13%0.19%
Charles River Laboratories International0.13%0.19%
Insulet Corp0.13%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in XLV
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%Eli Lilly & Co 16.56%
Jabil Inc 0.49%Johnson & Johnson 10.67%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%AbbVie Inc 7.76%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%UnitedHealth Group Inc 6.59%
Natera Inc 0.45%Merck & Co Inc 5.54%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Amgen Inc 3.41%
Twilio Inc 0.38%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.25%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%Abbott Laboratories 2.76%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VB and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isSmall-CapHealth care
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts+2.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%100.0%
Holdings131159

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or XLV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or XLV?
VB charges 0.03% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources