Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VB vs XLRE: how they differ
VB and XLRE hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VB and XLRE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VB | XLRE |
|---|---|---|
| Essex Property Trust Inc | 0.23% | 1.95% |
| Invitation Homes Inc | 0.22% | 1.72% |
| Weyerhaeuser Co | 0.21% | 1.80% |
| Kimco Realty Corp | 0.21% | 1.78% |
| Host Hotels & Resorts Inc | 0.20% | 1.57% |
| Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc | 0.20% | 1.68% |
| Healthpeak Properties Inc | 0.18% | 1.54% |
| Regency Centers Corp | 0.18% | 1.37% |
| UDR Inc | 0.16% | 1.23% |
| Camden Property Trust | 0.14% | 1.20% |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | 0.13% | 1.01% |
| BXP Inc | 0.13% | 1.02% |
| Only in VB | Only in XLRE |
|---|---|
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55% | Welltower Inc 11.07% |
| Jabil Inc 0.49% | Prologis Inc 8.72% |
| REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46% | Equinix Inc 7.10% |
| Astera Labs Inc 0.45% | American Tower Corp 5.26% |
| Natera Inc 0.45% | Simon Property Group Inc 5.01% |
| EMCOR Group Inc 0.45% | Realty Income Corp 4.57% |
| Twilio Inc 0.38% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.55% |
| NRG Energy Inc 0.38% | Public Storage 4.51% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| VB Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund | XLRE State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | State Street |
| What it is | Small-Cap | Real estate |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.2% | +5.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −2.3 pts | −11.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 21.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 1311 | 31 |
VB in plain words
VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLRE in plain words
XLRE is an index equity fund tracking the Real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VB or XLRE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and XLRE returned +5.6%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VB or XLRE?
- VB charges 0.03% a year and XLRE charges 0.08%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VB and XLRE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 100% of XLRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against XLRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-XLRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources