Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs XLK: how they differ

VB and XLK hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and XLK hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and XLK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBXLK
Jabil Inc0.49%0.23%
Qnity Electronics Inc0.21%0.19%
First Solar Inc0.15%0.14%
F5 Inc0.29%0.13%
CDW Corp/DE0.22%0.10%
Akamai Technologies Inc0.21%0.10%
Gen Digital Inc0.16%0.08%
PTC Inc0.16%0.07%
Zebra Technologies Corp0.15%0.07%
Tyler Technologies Inc0.15%0.07%
Trimble Inc0.14%0.07%
GoDaddy Inc0.14%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in XLK
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%NVIDIA Corp 14.66%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%Apple Inc 12.86%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%Microsoft Corp 8.38%
Natera Inc 0.45%Micron Technology Inc 5.42%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Broadcom Inc 5.41%
Twilio Inc 0.38%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.28%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%Intel Corp 3.68%
MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%Applied Materials Inc 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VB and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isSmall-CapTechnology
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%100.0%
Holdings131174

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or XLK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or XLK?
VB charges 0.03% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources