Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs XLI: how they differ

VB and XLI hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and XLI hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBXLI
EMCOR Group Inc0.45%0.64%
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc0.27%0.38%
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc0.26%0.39%
Lennox International Inc0.22%0.32%
Generac Holdings Inc0.21%0.30%
IDEX Corp0.20%0.29%
Masco Corp0.20%0.29%
Fedex Freight Holding Co Inc0.20%0.28%
Nordson Corp0.20%0.28%
Textron Inc0.19%0.28%
Jacobs Solutions Inc0.18%0.26%
Stanley Black & Decker Inc0.18%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in XLI
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%Caterpillar Inc 8.52%
Jabil Inc 0.49%General Electric Co 6.77%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%GE Vernova Inc 5.48%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%RTX Corp 4.44%
Natera Inc 0.45%Boeing Co/The 2.96%
Twilio Inc 0.38%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%Union Pacific Corp 2.81%
MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%Deere & Co 2.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VB and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isSmall-CapIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%100.0%
Holdings131181

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and XLI returned +14.3%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or XLI?
VB charges 0.03% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources