Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs XBI: how they differ

VB and XBI hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and XBI hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and XBI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBXBI
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc0.46%1.21%
Natera Inc0.45%1.17%
Moderna Inc0.30%1.41%
United Therapeutics Corp0.28%0.93%
Incyte Corp0.23%1.00%
Neurocrine Biosciences Inc0.21%0.97%
Bridgebio Pharma Inc0.16%1.03%
Exelixis Inc0.16%0.96%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc0.15%1.00%
Cytokinetics Inc0.14%1.18%
Insmed Inc0.14%1.08%
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc0.14%0.95%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in XBI
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%Oruka Therapeutics Inc 1.38%
Jabil Inc 0.49%Erasca Inc 1.27%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%SELLAS Life Sciences Group Inc 1.19%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Dianthus Therapeutics Inc 1.19%
Twilio Inc 0.38%Scholar Rock Holding Corp 1.16%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%Roivant Sciences Ltd 1.16%
MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%Travere Therapeutics Inc 1.13%
Flex Ltd 0.36%Alkermes PLC 1.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VB and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
XBI
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isSmall-CapSPDR S&P Biotech
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+64.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts+46.5 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%8.5%
Holdings1311150

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XBI in plain words

XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or XBI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and XBI returned +64.0%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or XBI?
VB charges 0.03% a year and XBI charges 0.35%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and XBI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 8% of XBI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against XBI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against XBI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-XBI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources