Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs VXF: how they differ

VB and VXF hold 75% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and VXF hold 75% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and VXF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBVXF
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.55%0.52%
Astera Labs Inc0.45%0.76%
Natera Inc0.45%0.46%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc0.46%0.44%
Twilio Inc0.38%0.37%
Carpenter Technology Corp0.35%0.36%
MKS Instruments Inc0.37%0.35%
Curtiss-Wright Corp0.34%0.33%
FTAI Aviation Ltd0.34%0.33%
Entegris Inc0.33%0.32%
nVent Electric PLC0.33%0.32%
ATI Inc0.33%0.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in VXF
Jabil Inc 0.49%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.19%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Snowflake Inc 1.03%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%Bloom Energy Corp 0.93%
Tapestry Inc 0.36%Cloudflare Inc 0.92%
Casey's General Stores Inc 0.36%Rocket Lab Corp 0.61%
Atmos Energy Corp 0.35%Cheniere Energy Inc 0.59%
Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.33%Ferguson Enterprises Inc 0.54%
Moderna Inc 0.30%Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VB and VXF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-CapExtended Market
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+14.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts−3.4 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%0.0%
Holdings13113365

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VXF in plain words

VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or VXF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and VXF returned +14.1%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or VXF?
VB charges 0.03% a year and VXF charges 0.05%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and VXF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 0% of VXF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 75% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against VXF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against VXF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-VXF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources