Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs VOX: how they differ

VB and VOX hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and VOX hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and VOX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBVOX
Omnicom Group Inc0.25%1.38%
Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One0.25%1.16%
Roku Inc0.22%1.02%
EchoStar Corp0.17%1.09%
AST SpaceMobile Inc0.15%1.42%
New York Times Co/The0.12%0.70%
Pinterest Inc0.11%0.72%
News Corp0.11%0.59%
Match Group Inc0.11%0.49%
Trade Desk Inc/The0.09%0.57%
Lumen Technologies Inc0.09%0.65%
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp0.09%0.35%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in VOX
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%Meta Platforms Inc 21.12%
Jabil Inc 0.49%Alphabet Inc 16.14%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%Alphabet Inc 10.61%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%Netflix Inc 4.77%
Natera Inc 0.45%Verizon Communications Inc 4.17%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Walt Disney Co/The 3.96%
Twilio Inc 0.38%AT&T Inc 3.69%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 2.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VB and VOX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
VOX
Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-CapCommunication Services
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+2.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts−14.6 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%84.5%
Holdings1311114

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOX in plain words

VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or VOX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and VOX returned +2.9%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or VOX?
VB charges 0.03% a year and VOX charges 0.09%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and VOX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 84% of VOX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against VOX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against VOX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-VOX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources