Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs VONG: how they differ

VB and VONG hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and VONG hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBVONG
Astera Labs Inc0.45%0.13%
Natera Inc0.45%0.09%
NRG Energy Inc0.38%0.08%
Tapestry Inc0.36%0.08%
FTAI Aviation Ltd0.34%0.08%
Jabil Inc0.49%0.07%
AST SpaceMobile Inc0.15%0.07%
Texas Pacific Land Corp0.16%0.07%
Everpure Inc0.30%0.07%
Insmed Inc0.14%0.06%
Burlington Stores Inc0.12%0.06%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp0.26%0.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in VONG
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%NVIDIA Corp 13.09%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%Apple Inc 11.97%
MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%Microsoft Corp 8.98%
Flex Ltd 0.36%Broadcom Inc 5.78%
Atmos Energy Corp 0.35%Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.34%Alphabet Inc 3.91%
nVent Electric PLC 0.33%Tesla Inc 3.48%
ATI Inc 0.33%Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VB and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-CapRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%95.6%
Holdings1311387

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and VONG returned +7.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or VONG?
VB charges 0.03% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources