Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs VLUE: how they differ

VB and VLUE hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and VLUE hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBVLUE
Jabil Inc0.49%0.57%
Twilio Inc0.38%0.35%
F5 Inc0.29%0.32%
Flex Ltd0.36%0.25%
Bunge Global SA0.20%0.52%
Textron Inc0.19%0.30%
WP Carey Inc0.19%0.25%
Centene Corp0.19%0.31%
Best Buy Co Inc0.18%0.21%
United Therapeutics Corp0.28%0.18%
Steel Dynamics Inc0.19%0.17%
Gen Digital Inc0.16%0.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in VLUE
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63%
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%INTEL CORPORATION 9.29%
Astera Labs Inc 0.45%CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 4.97%
Natera Inc 0.45%APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 3.67%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66%
MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%AT&T INC. 2.53%
Tapestry Inc 0.36%CITIGROUP INC. 1.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VB and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardiShares
What it isSmall-CapMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%96.9%
Holdings1311148

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or VLUE?
VB charges 0.03% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources