Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VB vs VGT: how they differ

VB and VGT hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VB and VGT hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VB and VGT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVBVGT
Flex Ltd0.36%0.31%
Astera Labs Inc0.45%0.28%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.55%0.22%
Jabil Inc0.49%0.20%
Qnity Electronics Inc0.21%0.18%
Twilio Inc0.38%0.18%
Okta Inc0.28%0.16%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc0.32%0.16%
Akamai Technologies Inc0.21%0.16%
F5 Inc0.29%0.15%
First Solar Inc0.15%0.19%
MKS Instruments Inc0.37%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VBOnly in VGT
REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%NVIDIA Corp 16.85%
Natera Inc 0.45%Apple Inc 14.59%
EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%Microsoft Corp 9.47%
NRG Energy Inc 0.38%Broadcom Inc 4.21%
Tapestry Inc 0.36%Micron Technology Inc 4.21%
Casey's General Stores Inc 0.36%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21%
Carpenter Technology Corp 0.35%Intel Corp 2.03%
Atmos Energy Corp 0.35%Cisco Systems Inc 1.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VB and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isSmall-CapInformation technology
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.3 pts+17.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50021.7%86.9%
Holdings1311317

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VB or VGT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +15.2% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VB or VGT?
VB charges 0.03% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VB and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of VB and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VB against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VB against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VB-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources