Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs XOVR: how they differ

USMV and XOVR hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and USMV returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and XOVR hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and XOVR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVXOVR
NVIDIA CORPORATION1.64%9.48%
ARISTA NETWORKS, INC.0.52%2.31%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.0.50%0.56%
DOORDASH, INC.0.20%2.04%
APPLOVIN CORPORATION0.11%3.95%
Astera Labs, Inc0.09%7.75%
META PLATFORMS, INC.0.09%4.47%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in XOVR
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%Alphabet Inc 6.53%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Natera Inc 3.70%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%Veeva Systems Inc 3.17%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%Reddit Inc 2.78%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64%
Chubb Limited 1.50%Axon Enterprise Inc 2.60%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49%Rocket Lab Corp 2.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

USMV and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
XOVR
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesERShares
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorPrivate-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year+6.6%0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts−17.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%43.4%
Holdings17032

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or XOVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so USMV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or XOVR?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so USMV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources