Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
USMV vs XLU: how they differ
USMV and XLU hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and USMV returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, USMV and XLU hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | USMV | XLU |
|---|---|---|
| DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION | 1.55% | 6.97% |
| THE SOUTHERN COMPANY | 1.53% | 7.62% |
| CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. | 1.35% | 2.88% |
| WEC ENERGY GROUP INC. | 0.92% | 2.69% |
| AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. | 0.55% | 5.26% |
| Xcel Energy Inc. | 0.55% | 3.54% |
| AMEREN CORPORATION | 0.30% | 2.21% |
| Dominion Energy, Inc. | 0.25% | 4.24% |
| CMS ENERGY CORPORATION | 0.22% | 1.67% |
| NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. | 0.13% | 12.93% |
| ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION | 0.07% | 2.03% |
| DTE ENERGY COMPANY | 0.06% | 2.24% |
| Only in USMV | Only in XLU |
|---|---|
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81% | Constellation Energy Corp 5.61% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64% | Sempra 4.28% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% | Entergy Corp 3.71% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56% | Vistra Corp 3.55% |
| AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51% | Exelon Corp 3.37% |
| Chubb Limited 1.50% | Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 2.86% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49% | PG&E Corp 2.62% |
| WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.48% | NRG Energy Inc 2.18% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | XLU State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI USA Min Vol Factor | Utilities |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.6% | +2.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.9 pts | −15.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 170 | 31 |
USMV in plain words
USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.
XLU in plain words
XLU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%. It sat 10.0% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, USMV or XLU?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and XLU returned +2.4%, so USMV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, USMV or XLU?
- USMV charges 0.15% a year and XLU charges 0.08%, so XLU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do USMV and XLU overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 100% of XLU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against XLU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-XLU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources