Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs XLC: how they differ

USMV and XLC hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and USMV returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and XLC hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVXLC
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.1.49%4.15%
T-MOBILE US, INC.1.17%4.16%
AT&T INC.0.99%4.10%
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.0.85%4.64%
ALPHABET INC.0.45%10.44%
NETFLIX, INC.0.23%4.84%
META PLATFORMS, INC.0.09%19.93%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in XLC
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%Alphabet Inc 13.10%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Comcast Corp 4.71%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%Walt Disney Co/The 4.49%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%Live Nation Entertainment Inc 3.50%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%Omnicom Group Inc 2.51%
Chubb Limited 1.50%EchoStar Corp 1.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

USMV and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+6.6%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%100.0%
Holdings17023

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and XLC returned −2.0%, so USMV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or XLC?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources