Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
USMV vs VXF: how they differ
USMV and VXF hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VXF returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, USMV and VXF hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | USMV | VXF |
|---|---|---|
| ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. | 0.31% | 0.47% |
| ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | 0.26% | 0.27% |
| SNOWFLAKE INC. | 0.24% | 1.03% |
| LIBERTY MEDIA CORP - FORMULA ONE GROUP | 0.57% | 0.24% |
| FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC. | 0.32% | 0.23% |
| UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION | 0.21% | 0.27% |
| CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. | 0.21% | 0.59% |
| NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC. | 0.31% | 0.20% |
| SUN COMMUNITIES, INC. | 0.54% | 0.16% |
| TRADEWEB MARKETS INC. | 0.16% | 0.14% |
| Astera Labs, Inc | 0.09% | 0.76% |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.08% | 0.52% |
| Only in USMV | Only in VXF |
|---|---|
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81% | Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.19% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64% | Bloom Energy Corp 0.93% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% | Cloudflare Inc 0.92% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56% | Rocket Lab Corp 0.61% |
| DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55% | Ferguson Enterprises Inc 0.54% |
| THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53% | Natera Inc 0.46% |
| AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51% | REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.44% |
| Chubb Limited 1.50% | ROBLOX Corp 0.43% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | VXF Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | MSCI USA Min Vol Factor | Extended Market |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.6% | +14.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.9 pts | −3.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 170 | 3365 |
USMV in plain words
USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.
VXF in plain words
VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, USMV or VXF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and VXF returned +14.1%, so VXF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, USMV or VXF?
- USMV charges 0.15% a year and VXF charges 0.05%, so VXF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do USMV and VXF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 0% of VXF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against VXF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-VXF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources