Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs VUG: how they differ

USMV and VUG hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and VUG returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and VUG hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and VUG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVVUG
NVIDIA CORPORATION1.64%12.63%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION1.56%7.62%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED1.15%1.13%
VISA INC.0.94%1.54%
APPLE INC.0.82%11.67%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY0.66%2.81%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION1.51%0.61%
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION1.25%0.54%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.0.53%2.62%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.0.53%0.78%
ARISTA NETWORKS, INC.0.52%0.52%
BROADCOM INC.0.50%4.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in VUG
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%Alphabet Inc 5.76%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Tesla Inc 3.27%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%Lam Research Corp 1.51%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%KLA Corp 1.10%
Chubb Limited 1.50%Sandisk Corp 0.94%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49%Intel Corp 0.79%
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.48%Western Digital Corp 0.62%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.44%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

USMV and VUG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
VUG
Vanguard Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorUS growth
Total return, 1 year+6.6%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%97.4%
Holdings170147

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

VUG in plain words

VUG is an index equity fund tracking the US growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or VUG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and VUG returned +12.9%, so VUG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or VUG?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and VUG charges 0.03%, so VUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and VUG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 97% of VUG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against VUG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against VUG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-VUG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources