Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs VTV: how they differ

USMV and VTV hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and VTV hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVVTV
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION1.60%2.13%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.1.81%1.57%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON1.44%2.30%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.42%2.96%
MERCK & CO., INC.1.18%1.19%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY1.11%1.28%
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY1.20%1.05%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT1.11%0.99%
WALMART INC.0.88%1.87%
Pepsico, Inc.1.02%0.70%
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY0.69%0.90%
ABBVIE INC.0.63%1.67%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in VTV
NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%Bank of America Corp 1.37%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 1.46%Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 1.07%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED 1.36%Intel Corp 1.05%
WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC. 1.28%Wells Fargo & Co 0.95%
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION 1.25%Morgan Stanley 0.93%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED 1.15%Citigroup Inc 0.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

USMV and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorUS value
Total return, 1 year+6.6%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%98.6%
Holdings170308

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or VTV?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources