Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs VOOG: how they differ

USMV and VOOG hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and VOOG hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVVOOG
NVIDIA CORPORATION1.64%14.29%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION1.56%9.31%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.42%2.42%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON1.44%0.89%
VISA INC.0.94%0.84%
APPLE INC.0.82%6.38%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED1.15%0.75%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.1.81%0.70%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY0.66%2.44%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.0.53%2.34%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION1.51%0.51%
BROADCOM INC.0.50%5.90%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in VOOG
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Alphabet Inc 6.17%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%Tesla Inc 2.12%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.43%
Chubb Limited 1.50%Caterpillar Inc 1.14%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49%Lam Research Corp 1.11%
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.48%KLA Corp 0.70%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 1.46%Sandisk Corp/DE 0.70%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED 1.36%Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 0.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

USMV and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+6.6%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%100.0%
Holdings170146

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or VOOG?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources