Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs VOE: how they differ

USMV and VOE hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and VOE hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVVOE
CENCORA, INC.1.28%0.91%
NEWMONT CORPORATION1.18%0.86%
CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.1.35%0.71%
WEC ENERGY GROUP INC.0.92%0.66%
The Travelers Companies, Inc.1.09%0.61%
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.0.94%0.59%
TE CONNECTIVITY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY0.59%1.02%
KEURIG DR PEPPER INC.0.55%0.73%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.0.55%0.65%
Xcel Energy Inc.0.55%0.87%
THE KROGER CO.0.70%0.53%
THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION0.51%1.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in VOE
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%Cummins Inc 1.71%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%Valero Energy Corp 1.34%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%CRH PLC 1.24%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%General Motors Co 1.21%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%SLB Ltd 1.21%
Chubb Limited 1.50%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

USMV and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+6.6%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%96.6%
Holdings170170

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and VOE returned +20.2%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or VOE?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources