Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
USMV vs VGT: how they differ
USMV and VGT hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, USMV and VGT hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | USMV | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 1.81% | 1.85% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 1.64% | 16.85% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 1.56% | 9.47% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT | 1.11% | 1.08% |
| APPLE INC. | 0.82% | 14.59% |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED | 0.78% | 1.11% |
| AMPHENOL CORPORATION | 1.51% | 0.73% |
| SALESFORCE, INC. | 0.88% | 0.70% |
| CORNING INCORPORATED | 0.68% | 0.61% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 0.53% | 3.21% |
| PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. | 0.53% | 0.92% |
| ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. | 0.52% | 0.69% |
| Only in USMV | Only in VGT |
|---|---|
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% | Intel Corp 2.03% |
| DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55% | Lam Research Corp 1.56% |
| THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53% | KLA Corp 1.00% |
| Chubb Limited 1.50% | Sandisk Corp/DE 0.98% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.81% |
| WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.48% | Western Digital Corp 0.76% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.44% | Dell Technologies Inc 0.61% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.42% | NXP Semiconductors NV 0.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | MSCI USA Min Vol Factor | Information technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.6% | +35.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.9 pts | +17.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.8% | 86.9% |
| Holdings | 170 | 317 |
USMV in plain words
USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.
VGT in plain words
VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, USMV or VGT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, USMV or VGT?
- USMV charges 0.15% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do USMV and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources