Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs VBR: how they differ

USMV and VBR hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VBR returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and VBR hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVVBR
F5, INC.0.63%0.50%
EXPAND ENERGY CORPORATION0.41%0.47%
FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC.0.32%0.33%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION0.21%0.25%
GEN DIGITAL INC.0.20%0.29%
GENERAL MILLS, INC.0.15%0.20%
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION0.07%0.62%
CDW CORPORATION0.06%0.39%
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION0.05%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in VBR
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%Jabil Inc 0.87%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%NRG Energy Inc 0.66%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Tapestry Inc 0.64%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%Moderna Inc 0.54%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%US Foods Holding Corp 0.48%
Chubb Limited 1.50%JB Hunt Transport Services Inc 0.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

USMV and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorSmall-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+6.6%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%30.5%
Holdings170840

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and VBR returned +16.3%, so VBR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or VBR?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources