Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

USMV vs VB: how they differ

USMV and VB hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and VB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions USMV and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingUSMVVB
F5, INC.0.63%0.29%
EXPAND ENERGY CORPORATION0.41%0.27%
LIBERTY MEDIA CORP - FORMULA ONE GROUP0.57%0.25%
INCYTE CORPORATION0.54%0.23%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION0.21%0.28%
NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.0.31%0.21%
FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC.0.32%0.19%
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.0.54%0.18%
GEN DIGITAL INC.0.20%0.16%
PTC INC.0.55%0.16%
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.0.46%0.15%
FIRST SOLAR, INC.0.38%0.15%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in USMVOnly in VB
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%Jabil Inc 0.49%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Natera Inc 0.45%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%Twilio Inc 0.38%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%
Chubb Limited 1.50%Flex Ltd 0.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

USMV and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Min Vol FactorSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+6.6%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.9 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50094.8%21.7%
Holdings1701311

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +6.6% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, USMV or VB?
USMV charges 0.15% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of USMV and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USMV against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USMV against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/USMV-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources