Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

URTH vs VYMI: how they differ

URTH and VYMI hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VYMI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI World ETF and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, URTH and VYMI hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions URTH and VYMI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingURTHVYMI
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.29%1.38%
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK0.21%0.99%
Allianz SE0.19%0.95%
UBS Group AG0.17%0.77%
Deutsche Telekom AG0.14%0.60%
Enbridge Inc.0.13%0.67%
BANK OF MONTREAL0.13%0.59%
GSK PLC0.11%0.57%
Zurich Insurance Group AG0.11%0.58%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE0.11%0.57%
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA0.11%0.53%
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED0.10%0.54%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in URTHOnly in VYMI
NVIDIA CORPORATION 5.64%HSBC Holdings PLC 1.73%
APPLE INC. 5.04%Novartis AG 1.56%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.50%Nestle SA 1.44%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86%Shell PLC 1.43%
ALPHABET INC. 2.43%Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.15%
BROADCOM INC. 2.21%Toyota Motor Corp 1.12%
ALPHABET INC. 2.01%Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.08%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51%BHP Group Ltd 1.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

URTH and VYMI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI WorldInternational High Dividend Yield
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+28.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+10.7 pts
Expense ratio0.24%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50070.3%0.1%
Holdings13221582

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

VYMI in plain words

VYMI is an index equity fund tracking the International High Dividend Yield. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1582 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, URTH or VYMI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URTH returned +17.4% and VYMI returned +28.2%, so VYMI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, URTH or VYMI?
URTH charges 0.24% a year and VYMI charges 0.07%, so VYMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do URTH and VYMI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 70% of URTH and 0% of VYMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

URTH against VYMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, URTH against VYMI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/URTH-VYMI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources