Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

URTH vs VXF: how they differ

URTH and VXF hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI World ETF and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, URTH and VXF hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions URTH and VXF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingURTHVXF
SNOWFLAKE INC.0.09%1.03%
CLOUDFLARE, INC.0.08%0.92%
ROCKET LAB CORPORATION0.08%0.61%
BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION0.07%0.93%
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.0.05%0.59%
Astera Labs, Inc0.05%0.76%
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.0.05%0.54%
STRATEGY INC0.04%0.34%
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.0.04%0.47%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.04%0.52%
SUNBELT RENTALS HOLDINGS, INC.0.04%0.36%
TWILIO INC.0.03%0.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in URTHOnly in VXF
NVIDIA CORPORATION 5.64%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.19%
APPLE INC. 5.04%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.36%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.50%MKS Instruments Inc 0.35%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86%Amrize Ltd 0.32%
ALPHABET INC. 2.43%nVent Electric PLC 0.32%
BROADCOM INC. 2.21%ATI Inc 0.32%
ALPHABET INC. 2.01%TechnipFMC PLC 0.31%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51%Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

URTH and VXF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI WorldExtended Market
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+14.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−3.4 pts
Expense ratio0.24%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50070.3%0.0%
Holdings13223365

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

VXF in plain words

VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, URTH or VXF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URTH returned +17.4% and VXF returned +14.1%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, URTH or VXF?
URTH charges 0.24% a year and VXF charges 0.05%, so VXF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do URTH and VXF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 70% of URTH and 0% of VXF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

URTH against VXF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, URTH against VXF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/URTH-VXF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources