Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

URTH vs VO: how they differ

URTH and VO hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI World ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, URTH and VO hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions URTH and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingURTHVO
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMIT0.21%1.05%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION0.20%1.07%
NEWMONT CORPORATION0.13%0.48%
VERTIV HOLDINGS CO0.13%1.23%
QUANTA SERVICES, INC.0.12%1.05%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC.0.11%1.04%
FEDEX CORPORATION0.10%0.33%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION.0.10%0.78%
CUMMINS INC.0.10%0.95%
FORTINET, INC.0.10%0.46%
THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.0.10%0.44%
CIENA CORPORATION0.09%0.67%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in URTHOnly in VO
NVIDIA CORPORATION 5.64%Southwest Airlines Co 0.24%
APPLE INC. 5.04%Medline Inc 0.15%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.50%Cerebras Systems Inc 0.06%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86%TKO Group Holdings Inc 0.06%
ALPHABET INC. 2.43%Symbotic Inc 0.01%
BROADCOM INC. 2.21%Venture Global Inc 0.01%
ALPHABET INC. 2.01%Lennar Corp 0.01%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

URTH and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI WorldMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.24%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50070.3%91.4%
Holdings1322282

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, URTH or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URTH returned +17.4% and VO returned +12.0%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, URTH or VO?
URTH charges 0.24% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do URTH and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 70% of URTH and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

URTH against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, URTH against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/URTH-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources